



 

 

 


.
[
Message
Board
]
. |

My Perspective on Kung Fu
Some
Background to the Current Situation in America Today
By
Sifu Michael Manganiello
1-7-2006
The first thing a prospective
student should consider when choosing a school or particular
style of martial art is, "What do you expect to gain or achieve
by studying this or that particular style, and will this method
of study help me achieve those goals?"
All martial arts training will
increase stamina, focus, concentration, confidence, etc. by
their very nature. But different styles and schools tend to put
emphasis on particular aspects of training. For instance, if
forms competition is a primary goal, aesthetically enhanced
styles such as Wu Shu or Northern Eagle Claw with their wide
array of high kicks and acrobatics would be more appropriate
than say, Wing Chun or Southern Mantis, where the forms are
minimalist and conceptual in nature.
Should sparring/tournament
competition be your primary focus, this can run the gamut from
light/no contact point sparring to full contact San Shou (e.g.
Tae Kwon Do to Muay Thai). If on the other hand, grappling and
ground fighting are your cup of chai, the various disciplines of
Jiu-Jitsu or Shuai Chiao would more appropriately fit the bill.
The key here is to understand the strengths and limitations of
each discipline and how that relates to your personal goals.
At Ling Nam Siu Lum, the
primary focus has always been on Self-Defense and
Self-Improvement. That is not to say that I don't train students
for tournament competition, I just don't emphasize it as much as
commercial schools do. Let us make a distinction in terms here:
Self-Defense training involves those techniques and methods
which allow a practitioner to incapacitate an opponent as
efficiently and quickly as possible, regardless of size, number
of opponents and level of threat (armed or unarmed). This
requires attacking some of the most vulnerable areas on the
body. Such tactics would be taboo in sport competition for
obvious safety reasons. The mindset of the self-defense
practitioner also poses certain problems in the sporting arena.
The Self-Defense practitioner, particularly Southern Kung Fu
stylists, by their very nature, are relentless in their attacks.
They constantly press forward in their attacks maintaining
pressure on the opponent, allowing no quarter, so as to
efficiently dispose of the opponent as quickly as possible. This
is achieved by controlling the opponent's "bridge" through such
methods as sticking, trapping and/or destroying the opponent's
bridge.
At the highest levels of
training, blows are often issued with the single knuckle (Fu Nan
Choi /Phoenix Eye Fist) or fingertip (Bil Jee). Target areas are
the nerve plexuses and "cavities" (areas that allow you to "seal
the air and blood flow"). Kicks are kept primarily low and
tight, and are used to bridge the gap and destroy the opponent's
structure (breaking the horse). Due to the close proximity of
the combatants, blows are often delivered close in, sometimes
within inches of the opponent's body. Combined with the Chi Sao
(sticky hands) exercises, the practitioner develops a
hair-trigger reflexive mechanism that allows him to react
instantaneously, by feel (rather than sight), thus executing
offense and defense simultaneously.
Training Self-Defense is an
arduous process that requires constant repetition of specific
techniques so as to unlock the mechanism by which that
particular move works. Once one understands the concept of how a
particular move works, then you can begin to explore the myriad
variations of how to apply that move in a real-life situation.
This allows you to adapt it to different opponents of varying
skill and size. Remember this: IT IS NEVER THE SAME ON THE
STREET AS IT WAS IN THE CLASSROOM. There will always be some
subtle change in the opponent and/or situation that you must
readily adapt to. Only by "touching hands" with numerous
training partners and by constant analysis and modification of
technique can one achieve this.
In the beginning, technique
training is performed at a slow to moderate pace, with the
students concentrating on footwork, hand placement, and target
recognition. At this level, the emphasis is placed on form,
content, distancing and timing, NOT speed. Poor form, performed
quickly, becomes poorer, not better, and often translates
SLOWER, due to wasted motion and poor positioning. Speed is the
by-product of constant repetition and economy of motion. TRUE
SPEED IS EFFORTLESS.
As students progress, they will
be introduced to many drills and apparatus designed to enhance
various facets of training. One of the most peculiar training
devices, and one that is unique to the Southern Kung Fu systems
is the Mook Yan Jong (Wooden Man). It is used to train the
student in the techniques and spatial relations of in fighting,
while simultaneously conditioning the hands and limbs to impact.
The protruding arms and leg of the Wooden Man can be interpreted
to represent the infinite number of combinations possible in
close quarters combat. A student must learn to read the
"language" of the dummy. Combined with the hand conditioning,
focus mitts, and heavy bag drills this provides an outlet for
the practitioner to execute techniques at full speed and power
safely before moving on to contact training with a partner. It
is at this stage that the student will be introduced to Chi-Kung
training and Chinese Herbology. Chi-Kung comprises a series of
deep breathing and dynamic tension exercises that increase the
circulation, strengthen the bone and sinew and enhance the
overall, general well-being of the practitioner. At this time
the student is also introduced to the vast pharmacopoeia of
Chinese Herbology and begins instruction in the making of the
various herbal liniments, powders and poultices that are used to
prevent and treat the bruises, sprains and strains that can
occur during rigorous training. Many of these formulae are
hundreds of years old and are amongst some of the most closely
guarded secrets of the various Kung Fu clans. Many times,
teachers were sought out specifically for their "Tieh Da"
(healing) skills as well as their martial ability. The late
Hsing-I/Bagua Sifu Kenny Gong of New York Chinatown comes to
mind. Both I and many of my training brethren "crossed school
lines" to receive treatment from this venerable master. For a
Kung Fu student, learning how to heal should be just as
important as learning how to fight. As a Sifu, I would be very
reluctant to take on a student whose only interest was to learn
how to hurt people.
As the practitioner's skill level increases, so does the
intensity of the training, until finally they don the necessary
protective gear and proceed to train SPECIFIC techniques at full
speed and power. This is performed under very close supervision
and very specific guidelines so as to achieve total mastery of
"specific techniques" and at the same time, minimizing injury.
Note the emphasis: Sparring "willy-nilly" results in nothing
more than a full-contact game of "tag" at best, and unnecessary
injury at worst. Only after achieving a certain level of skill
and control and amassing a catalog of techniques should one
attempt to "free spar" at the full-contact level. Keep in mind
what the Primary Goal is: To hone specific techniques against a
LIVE opponent, and to test the parameters of effectiveness of
those techniques against opponents of varying skill level and
size.
Sparring, on the other hand, is
a whole different ballgame. First and foremost, sparring has
rules of engagement (street fighting does not!). Now, these
rules can run the gamut of point fighting/light contact all the
way up to the all-out brawling of UFC/"Tough Man" contests. Even
in the most extreme contests there are still rules! In addition
to level of contact these rules can dictate:
1) Non-target areas
(Kicks below the waist, strikes
to kidneys, spine, head, etc.)
2) Methods of attack
(Punches, pokes, kicks, elbows,
knees, grappling, sweeps, throws, joint locks, chokes, etc.)
3) Number of punches thrown before a
mandatory kick must be thrown
4) Weight class, age, belt divisions
5) Arena size
6) Mandatory protective equipment and
degree of padding
7) Length and number of rounds
8) Number of referees
9) Intensity of engagement
(point fighting as opposed to
continuous full-contact)
(Please see the corresponding table
at the end of this article)
These rules serve a very
specific purpose: They provide a safe and enjoyable forum for
practitioners to exercise and RECREATE their martial arts
technique in a competitive, sportsmanlike manner. Note the
emphasis, it’s not a type-o; sparring and subsequently
tournament fighting is a form of MARTIAL RECREATION. This is an
almost entirely western phenomenon that has occurred in the last
few decades as oriental martial arts schools have become more
accessible to westerners. Over the last twenty years or so,
martial arts schools have popped-up in every strip mall in
America. As competition for student enrollment has increased,
the more commercial schools have geared their regimens toward
tournament-based competition, with a subsequent emphasis on
techniques and training methods that are acceptable in the
general tournament arena. For commercial schools, hosting open
tournaments is an excellent source of revenue, in addition to
sales of paraphernalia emblazoned with the school logo and belt
tests (another western marketing invention).
Sparring has its place as long
as one understands its strengths and limitations. For children
beginning martial arts training, provided they have mastered the
appropriate basics (one-two years) points/light contact sparring
can be an excellent way to build confidence and character and
teach the rudiments of basic technique application. It also
provides the instructor with an opportunity to observe the
child's temperament and level of self-control, before proceeding
with more serious levels of training. For older students, who
are past the point of "knocking around with the young bucks" but
still have a desire to recreate, sparring provides a safe forum
to do so, without the attendant bumps and bruises inherent in
more rigorous contact training. So, what role does sparring play
in teaching self-defense? Quite frankly, very little. In brief,
sparring, however rigorous is about recreation within
pre-determined parameters. Self-Defense, on the other hand, is
about survival at any cost, with any means available. SPARRING
AND SELF-DEFENSE ARE TWO SEPARATE DISCIPLINES AND RARELY THE
'TWAIN SHALL THEY MEET.
Now before I'm inundated with
emails and phone calls about how rigorous yours, this one or
that one's training is, allow me to make a concise comparison.
First and foremost, sparring/tournament competition, as it is
practiced in America today, GENERALLY SPEAKING, barely reflects
the arts that spawned them. One only has to attend the average
tournament and then try to separate the players based on their
various styles and disciplines. Other than breaking them down
into grapplers, kickers and punchers, or some combination of the
three, they all pretty much look the same. WHY? One need only
examine how the tournament scene in America developed. For the
most part it was pioneered by the Japanese and Korean styles
(Karate, Jui-Jitsu, Judo, Kenpo, Tae Kwon Do, etc.). Naturally,
rules and regulations evolved around the common threads (basic
punches, kicks and backfists, etc.) inherent to these styles.
Keep in mind this was the 60's, early 70's. Most martial arts
schools were in the worst neighborhoods in the city. Violent
crime/gang activity were at an all-time high. In most
households, both parents worked, which meant there were no
"Soccer Moms" dropping us off at nice, safe, suburban mall-type
locations. We were JHS and SHS-aged kids hopping buses and
trains and walking through some of NYC's toughest neighborhoods
in order to attend classes and compete. Quite often en route you
got to "test out" some of your latest techniques. As they used
to say in the old days, "There was no classroom quite like the
streets." The tournaments themselves were still pretty loose
affairs. Other than athletic cups and mouthpieces, there was no
protective equipment available. It hadn't been invented yet!
Level of contact varied from ring to ring and bout to bout,
depending upon the ref, the locations, and the contestants
themselves. The bouts themselves were held in high school gyms,
YMCA's, and boxing clubs. We were bare-knuckled and barefoot. We
took our lumps, we gave our lumps, and nobody complained. The
term "lawsuit" wasn't even in the lexicon.
Up until that point, Kung Fu
stylists like myself were an oddity. Most Kung Fu schools were
ensconced in the various Chinatowns (NYC, Boston, San Francisco,
etc.). They were very insular in nature, and operated on an
"invitation-only" basis. Students who participated in these
"outsider" events often did so without the support of their club
and most often to the disdain of their masters. One must
remember that many of these clubs owed their origins to the
various "Tong Associations" and secret Triads of Hong Kong
society. Secrecy and exclusivity were bywords of their very
existence. Other than performing very carefully edited versions
of their forms during Chinese New Year's/Lion Dance festivities,
Chinese masters rarely performed in public. To this day, there
are some prominent schools in Chinatown that, to my knowledge,
have never allowed their art to be shown in public. Yet things
were about to change.
On the East Coast, Aaron Banks’
Oriental World of Self-Defense at Madison Square Garden
was starting to draw some of the biggest Chinatown people out
into the public eye. The western world was suddenly exposed to a
martial spectacle the likes of which had not been seen since the
Boxer Rebellion of the early 1900's. Displays of exotic weaponry
and martial styles that dazzled and boggled the mind.
Demonstrations of Chi-Gung and breaking that seemed to defy the
laws of western science. Enter Kenpo's Ed Parker and his Long
Beach, California Martial Arts Expo and the introduction
of a young, up-coming martial arts movie star named Bruce Lee.
The rest, as they say, was history.
Fueled by the sudden emergence
of Hong Kong films on western screens (Five Fingers of Death,
Fists of Fury, etc.) the Kung Fu boom of the 70's was on.
Many of the younger Chinese Sifu, more westernized than their
older, more conservative counterparts, were already straining at
the yokes placed on them by their elders and Chinatown society.
Suddenly the floodgates opened. Magazines like Karate
Illustrated, Black Belt, and Inside Kung Fu
were popping up at newsstands everywhere. They featured articles
by young Sifu who were to become some of the most venerated
names in Chinese martial arts today: Gin Foon Mark, discussing
the principles of Southern Praying Mantis; Quentin Fong, posing
a hypothetical match-up of White Crane vs. Wing Chun; Bill
Chung, demonstrating Hung Gar weaponry; the great Iron Palm
master Share Lew, discussing his training methods and Dit Da Jow,
etc. As a kid, I remember reading an article about a young
upstart on the West Coast who was ruffling a lot of feathers,
not only because of his skill in Choy Li Fut, but because of his
very young age. His name was Doc Fai Wong. Subjects like this
had never seen the light of day in English print before. All
this would have a profound effect on the tournament scene. Kung
Fu players began to dominate the tournaments in every division.
In the forms division, the incredible array of the Kung Fu
disciplines coupled with the enormous lengths of the sets
(400-500 moves) gave them an extremely competitive edge over the
more homogenous-looking Kata of Karate and TKD, most of which
were 60-70 moves at best. This was even more so in the weapons
division with the exotic nature and diversity of the Chinese
weaponry, coupled with the intense complexity of the sets often
winning them the top slots.
As for the sparring division,
Kung Fu players were taking it out through a whole new door.
They didn't have rules in place to even deal with the type of
techniques we were using. Our distinct advantage was that from
one player to the next, we were totally unpredictable. White
Crane, Hung Gar and Choy Li Fut with their long-swinging
5-Element punches hit like freight trains, while Bak Mei, Wing
Chun and Mantis players would jam in close, negating their
opponent's kicks, which were their primary weapons, while
trapping their arms and delivering flurries of unbelievably
quick and accurate palm strikes and punches. Our tactical
advantage was that we had watched and studied their methods for
years, and pretty much knew what their strategies were and how
to take advantage of them. They, on the other hand, had never
seen our methods before, and were at a loss to formulate
counter-strategies quickly. This was not to say that the Karate
people were pushovers. They were just stuck playing catch-up. We
had the element of surprise in our favor. In the end, it always
came down to the two opponents in the ring. Once again, things
were about to change, this time for the worse. It wasn't long
before some of the more innovative Karate people began emulating
our techniques. Although first attempts were crude at best, as
they were unsupported by the drills (Chi Sao, etc.) necessary to
develop these skills, their accuracy was due to improve with a
new invention. Video cameras /players. Whereas prior, one could
only hope to gain techniques through observation from the
sidelines, or even worse, while on the receiving end, now a
practitioner could analyze techniques at great length, over and
over, even in slow motion. Soon to follow was actual video
instruction, with complete breakdowns of entire forms and
techniques. Before long, instructional books in English began to
flood the market as well. Almost overnight, the "Eclectic
Styles" of martial arts were born. At best, these were a
hodgepodge of ideas and techniques, usually acquired from the
"lower levels" of other styles. Quite often they carried
ridiculous monikers, such as "Way of the White Dragon," "Golden
Snake," "Iron Octopus," etc. In their idealistic zeal, they
sought to create "superior" styles that required less training
and time spent learning "useless" forms or as Bruce Lee would
put it, "The Classical Mess." ("No need to diet or exercise,
just take our magic pill and melt the fat away!" Sound
familiar?). As if they, in their meager lifetimes, quite often
armed with nothing more than tournament style fighting
experience and a few months training in this or that discipline,
could outdo methods that had been honed through a thousand years
of battle-proven warfare.
Needless to say, arrogant and
pretentious at the very least. And why not. They had the
blessing of the greatest hodgepodger of all time: Bruce Lee.
Those were the best of the lot. At the bottom of the barrel, you
had the "Charlatan types." The "better" of these were the Karate
schools that became "Kung Fu" schools overnight. Recipe as
follows: Basic martial arts moves, add in some flowery/flashy
hand techniques with equally flashy nomenclature (e.g. Dragon
Mounting Splitting Palm, etc.); change the gi's to Kung Fu
jackets; change the belts to multi-colored sashes; teach
students to count 1-10 in Chinese (instead of Japanese); change
the name on the sign and stationary; shake, stir, a little P.R.,
and V'OILA! PRESTO! CHANGE-O! As I mentioned, these were the
"better" of the bunch. The absolute worst were the "made-up"
styles. With little more than rudimentary martial arts skills,
they targeted the suburban shopping malls and strips that were
springing up in the more affluent areas outside the cities. As
bad as these "charlatan emporiums" were at the time, no one in
their right mind would ever begin to envision what they would
become. A decade later, we would be treated to Power Rangers and
Mutant-Ninja Turtles, Clip boards in hand, walking the malls,
signing-up anything that moved, (so much for discerning criteria
for student enrollment). Dignity, honor and martial ability
would soon be supplanted by salesmanship, demographics and
marketing skills.
Not that any of this had
escaped the mournful gaze of the "elders" on both sides of the
fence. The sudden "bastardization" of these once pure art forms
was resulting in a tremendous air of resentment. The Chinese,
for their part, were still coming to grips with the exposure of
their arts to the public in general. Where imitation might have
been construed as a form of flattery, this sudden brazen
commerciality was akin to heresy. As for the Japanese/Korean
contingent, they were twice as incensed. Bad enough they were
having a hard time competing at their own tournaments; to add
insult to injury, they were starting to see a defection in the
ranks to the other side, or even worse, breakaways into the
"Eclectic" styles. At the lower ranks, this represented a loss
of revenue. When it occurred in the upper echelons, the effect
could often be catastrophic, with a popular senior student
leaving and taking many of his young protégé with him. This not
only caused a loss of teaching staff, (sometimes even a
potential heir who had been groomed for the top slot), but quite
often resulted in future competition "up the block" so to speak.
In my eyes, the greatest transgression (or "infamnia" if you
will) a student can commit is to go off and teach without the
blessing and/or the authorization of his teacher. This has
always been the "root cause" of deterioration within any martial
system, with each succeeding generation producing practitioners
with less knowledge and technique than the preceding one. Quite
often, these "bastard" bloodlines would implode within two or
three generations. This was especially true of the "Eclectic"
systems, which usually had less structure and depth to begin
with.
As I said before, things were
about to change. The Japanese/Korean elders were about to bring
the hammer down. After all, this (the tournament scene) was
their party and we were becoming unwelcome guests. They simply
began to change the rules. In the fighting division, we soon
found our best techniques outlawed (e.g. Element punches, Chain
punches, sweeps, trips, etc.). So much for the tactical
advantage that our unique styles bestowed upon us. We were about
to be "homogenized." If we wished to continue competing it would
be under "their" rules, using "their" methods of combat.
Ridiculous restrictions, such as "mandatory kick per 2-3 punches
thrown" would serve to severely limit our strategies as well.
Our dominance in the fighting divisions would soon decline.
Needless to say, our participation in fighting divisions would
soon decline as well.
In the forms division, time
limits were set that effectively cut our forms in half, reducing
the intensity of the Kung Fu sets as compared to the other
styles. Eventually, we were shunted off to a "Chinese Division,"
where we were forced to compete with the now growing Wu Shu
population as well as the burgeoning B.S. "Eclectic" styles. The
concept of performing before a panel of judges made up of Wu Shu
and Eclectic styles and subsequently loosing to some idiot in
neon blue pajamas performing a breakdance routine with a chain
whip, was quite frankly, more than anyone could bear. Needless
to say, attendance by traditional stylists soon tapered off. We
now found ourselves on the outside looking in. It wasn't long
before we retreated to the privacy of the Chinatown schools once
again, our heads bowed as the elder masters wagged their
fingers, "I told you so," "This was not for us," etc. Some
Chinatown schools attempted to stage their own competitions,
(most notably Fu Jow Pai), but internecine rivalry, combined
with the general apathy of the times prevented anything from
getting off the ground. It would be almost two decades before
Southern Kung Fu stylists would re-emerge back on the East Coast
scene en masse, sparked by the then newly-formed East Coast
Kung Fu Federation. First came the Kung Fu Masters
Exhibition, followed shortly thereafter by the Wong Fei
Hung International Commemorative Tournament, hosted by one
of my former masters, Sifu (Frank) Yee Chee Wai. It probably
represents one of the best venues for a traditional Kung Fu
stylist to get a "fair shake" at this time. Their forms division
is very well developed, with separate divisions for Northern,
Southern, Wu Shu, Internal, Long Hand, Short Hand, Long, Short
and Flexible weapons, etc. The sparring and Chi Sao divisions
are still experiencing "growing pains," as they are rife with
the usual Chinatown politics (the rules tend to vacillate from
ring to ring) but they will come along in time.
Self-Defense
|
|
Sparring
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. TARGET AREAS |
|
1. TARGET AREAS |
|
a) Head (Eyes, Throat, Temples,
Bridge of Nose, Nerve Plexuses, etc.) |
|
a) Head - Off limits (Even in USC
"Tough Man" contests, these are considered forbidden
targets. General strikes to front of head only). |
|
b) Body (Spine, Kidneys, Pelvis,
Groin, Solar Plexus, Armpits, Collarbone, etc.) |
|
b) Body - Front of the body only.
Generally speaking, blows must be kept above the waist
and below the collarbone. |
|
c) Legs, Knees, Ankles |
|
c) Legs, Knees, Ankles - Off
limits: All blows must be above the waist. |
|
|
|
|
|
2. METHODS OF ATTACK
(TECHNIQUES) |
|
2. METHODS OF ATTACK
(TECHNIQUES) |
|
a) Poking (Bil Jee), Clawing,
Ripping, Gouging, Raking, Phoenix Eye and Leopard Punch.
*Many of the
Southern Short Hand arts rely heavily on these methods.
Their removal severely limits their arsenal, leaving
them at an extreme disadvantage against larger, stronger
opponents. |
|
a) Poking, Clawing, Ripping,
Gouging, Raking, various Knuckle punches.
Not allowed and/or hindered by the
use of padded gloves, chest protectors and helmets.
|
|
b) Elbow and Knee Strikes |
|
b) Elbow and Knee Strikes - not
allowed at most tournaments. Muay Thai and UFC etc,
only. |
|
c) Joint Locks, Grapples, Throws,
Sweeps and Chokes. |
|
c) Joint Locks, Grapples, Throws,
Sweeps and Chokes - Not allowed at most tournaments -
UFC type tournaments only. |
|
d) Punches and Kicks |
|
d) Punches and Kicks - Generally
allowed with constraints of aforementioned target areas
listed above. |
|
|
|
|
|
3. NUMBER OF PUNCHES THROWN
BEFORE MANDATORY KICK MUST BE THROWN |
|
3. NUMBER OF PUNCHES THROWN
BEFORE MANDATORY KICK MUST BE THROWN |
|
a) Severely limits the concept of
chain punching. Kicks not always practical in
self-defense application depending on terrain,
proximity, ground conditions (wet, snow, slippery, etc.)
Makes a practitioner's rhythm much more easily
predictable. |
|
a) Obviously favors the kicking
styles while severely limiting the infighters. |
|
|
|
|
|
4. WEIGHT CLASS, AGE AND BELT
DIVISIONS |
|
4. WEIGHT CLASS, AGE AND BELT
DIVISIONS |
|
a) This has NO BEARING ON
THE STREET AT ALL. |
|
a) A necessary construct for the
safe practice of martial arts in a sportsman-like
manner. |
Self-Defense
|
|
Sparring
|
|
5. ARENA SIZE |
|
5. ARENA SIZE |
|
a) Self-Defense situations
predominantly occur in closed-in areas. |
|
a) Provides room for maneuvering
and evasion. |
|
|
|
|
|
6. MANDATORY PROTECTIVE
EQUIPMENT AND DEGREE OF PADDING |
|
6. MANDATORY PROTECTIVE
EQUIPMENT AND DEGREE OF PADDING |
|
a) As mentioned above, having to
work with an opponent who is “protected/padded” severely
limits some of the highest-level techniques.
In a sparring situation, a
practitioner delivering a fingertip strike to a padded
target area on his opponent's body will not have the
shock value of an opponent throwing haymaker punches and
kicks. This is the primary reason to divide people into
weight classes. The smaller practitioner suddenly bereft
of the techniques necessary to bring down a larger
opponent, finds himself at a serious disadvantage,
coupled with referees that might not recognize many of
these techniques; in a point match, this can be a
distinct disadvantage. |
|
a) Necessary for the safe
promulgation of the sport. |
|
|
|
|
|
7. LENGTH AND NUMBER OF ROUNDS |
|
7. LENGTH AND NUMBER OF ROUNDS |
|
a) In real life situations, time
often favors the other guy. Self-Defense situations are
often measured in seconds, not minutes or rounds.
(All cinematic fight scenes aside). |
|
a) Running the clock, feinting,
nettling the opponent with stinging jabs, maneuvering,
wearing down an opponent and evasion are all necessary
and useful skills in a sporting arena. In these
instances, stamina can be a technique unto itself. |
|
|
|
|
|
8. NUMBER OF REFEREES |
|
8. NUMBER OF REFEREES |
|
a) In the street there are no
rules, much less anyone to enforce them. By the same
token, the self-defense practitioner is unhindered in
delivering relentless and continuous attacks that would
quite often be interrupted by the presence of referees
and/or the rules of engagement. |
|
a) Once again, a necessary
construct required for the safe conduct of any sporting
event. |
|
|
|
|
|
9. INTENSITY OF ENGAGEMENT |
|
9. INTENSITY OF ENGAGEMENT |
|
a) As mentioned above, it is to the
self-defense practitioner's advantage to press an attack
when an opponent is on the ropes or down. |
|
a) Depending upon level of contact
(point fighting/continuous full contact). The
above-mentioned referee's intervention quite often
artificially extends a contest beyond what would have
occurred in a real-life situation, had an opponent been
allowed to press an attack. |
These are just some of my thoughts for the moment. These will be
part of an ongoing series on various aspects of Kung Fu
training. Sorry that this page has been so long in coming, but
now future articles will be forthcoming in more frequent
succession.
To be continued...
Note: internet video
instruction will be available shortly- covering all aspects of
the programs available at Ling Nam.
Home
| Academy
| The Sifu |
Styles |
Philosophy
| Weapons
| Curriculum
Lion
Dance | Media |
School Hours
| News | Contact
Design: www.avalon-webdesign.com |
.. |